Collection precedes suspicion
The city's policy expressly says reasonable suspicion or probable cause is not required to query ALPR data. Policy source
What is happening
Published City purchase records document 47 ALPR readers. On September 7, Celina's portal reported 48 “LPR and other cameras.” The public records reviewed here do not identify or classify the additional portal camera. This page shows what a reader captures, how long the record remains searchable, where the data can go, and which reader locations the City has published.
Plain-language guide
Flock describes its readers as still-image devices. A record can contain the plate number, a vehicle image, make, model, color, date, time, location, and other vehicle characteristics. Flock product description Flock FAQ
Authorized users can run retroactive searches across past detections. Hotlist alerts are generated in real time when a detected plate appears on a list. Celina says the cameras detect plates and vehicle characteristics, not faces, people, gender, or race. Celina technology page Transparency portal
Before enforcement action on an alert, policy requires an officer to compare the plate and vehicle image and confirm the record through NCIC. Celina ALPR policy
Data flow
This diagram summarizes the published process. A raw alert is not a confirmed match or an enforcement outcome.
Why decommission the network
Written safeguards do not eliminate routine collection, retrospective search, outside access, or travel records about people unconnected to an investigation.
The city's policy expressly says reasonable suspicion or probable cause is not required to query ALPR data. Policy source
The policy says Celina reads are sent to Texas DPS every 24 hours, while the public portal lists more than 1,000 sharing entries. Policy Portal
Official records identify six sites; the 2025 purchase establishes 41 more readers without locating them in the reviewed packet. Phase 1 plan 2025 order
The goal is to end the program, remove every reader, close outside access, and delete ordinary stored data where the law allows. A public review is the first step.
Email City CouncilInteractive map
Each marker comes directly from the Police Department's 2024 Phase 1 planning document. These six locations represent only part of the 47-reader network.
Select a numbered marker for the camera ID, intersection, direction, verification status, and source. Open the Phase 1 planning document
| ID | Intersection | Direction | Coordinates | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F#001 | S. Preston Road at Frontier Parkway | Northbound | 33.2675863, -96.7838485 | Official record |
| F#002 | N. Preston Road at County Road 106 | Southbound | 33.3826799, -96.7656971 | Official record |
| F#003 | E. Outer Loop at FM 2478 | Westbound | 33.2989155, -96.7329406 | Official record |
| F#004 | W. Outer Loop at S. Preston Road | Westbound | 33.2937437, -96.7844026 | Official record |
| F#005 | E. Outer Loop at S. Preston Road | Eastbound | 33.2937209, -96.7806730 | Official record |
| F#006 | Crutchfield Road at FM 1385 | Eastbound | 33.2675811, -96.8928355 | Official record |
The 2025 order form and staff presentation establish an expansion of 41 readers, but the reviewed records do not provide their sites. Celina's grant testimony says the planned readers would cover major entry and exit points, commercial areas, and construction zones. Those broad areas are not a usable inventory. 2025 order form Grant testimony
The presenter also described conversations with Walmart and said he believed Lowe's would help put up readers. The record does not show that either company installed one, whether private readers feed Celina's system, or whether any are included in the documented 47-reader purchase total or the portal's 48-camera figure.
This website does not estimate, geocode, or copy unverified locations. DeFlock is a separate crowdsourced reference, not Celina's official camera inventory.
Sharing network
On September 7, 2026, the live list contained 1,082 entries representing 1,079 distinct organization names, including one entry explicitly labeled federal. The portal calls these organizations “granted access” to Celina data. Live portal
That list does not prove that every listed organization searched or used Celina data. It also does not show how often outside agencies searched the data or for what purposes. Query logs and sharing-history records are needed to answer those questions.
Ask for answers
Residents should know where the readers are and have a public discussion about ending the program and removing every city-operated ALPR reader.